Domaining.com BackFlops

Posted by admin in DnExpose on 31-12-2008

This is a follow up: After I wrote this Domaining.com Decides to restore your account and give it to you for free. Why? because they seen the loss that they was taking. Just wanted to inform everyone you will get a newsletter.

When I woke up this morning I check my e-mail and found another email from the all popular Domaining.com. It said Your “Domaining.com account has been closed” I opened it and come to find out. Domaining.com will be charging $35/year to get the newsletter. Which kinda sucks cause I am not paying that.

The newletter s helpful but I will just search each blog they had listed and get the RSS or a newletter from them. I already have other Newsletters coming my way. So I still get the same information for free.

They are just trying to make a check and I think its wrong, where has all the morals gone when domaining. Flipping a domain is fine, but chargeing to get newsletter and have an account at Domaining.com the only thing I used at domaining.com was the newsletter.

With that said Good Luck to anyone that pays the 35 bucks.

High Domains

Posted by admin in DnExpose on 31-12-2008

Recently google released the new pagerank for everyones site. Well with that come some saddness or good happyness, For me it was sadness. DnWords Dropped pagerank while my Host, ViseHost is now pagerank 1. I don’t understand why, DnWords has more backlinks, more traffic and more everything then it did 2 1/2 months ago. While visehost only has about 8 backlinks.

This leaves me with one solution, Google is stange with the acception that I do not know how google PR works. But with the New Design, Upgrade and all. I think We will go up in Pr again on the next pr update.

So with that said you need to go check your domains and see if you are happy or sad or none of them moved. You can leave linked domains here that got pr or the ones that dropped pr.

Thanks

Hostix

Interview With @NameCheap: The Most Popular Registrar on Twitter

Posted by Mark Fulton in DnExpose on 31-12-2008

Many web developers, designers and now domainers are flocking like an army of little blue birds to Twitter, a social status service that allows you to share what you are doing in 140 characters or less. Over the Holidays, NameCheap.com ran a wildly successful trivia contest promotion which amassed them a huge number of followers. This is the story of their success on Twitter.

About how many Twitter followers did @NameCheap have before your contest began?

Maybe 30. We set it up and used to to answer basic questions and offer specials, but it wasn’t something used regularly.  (NameCheap now has 4,221 followers!)

What has the response from contest participants been?

Overwhelmingly, they loved it. Many people asked for more contests. It was blogged about quite a bit as well, with some participants even showing how to answer the quickest. Even the CEO of Twitter, Evan Williams, mentioned how much he liked the idea.

What was the total amount of domain names that were won?

Over 600.

Who organized all the Christmas trivia questions? I’m sure they deserve some recognition.

Our Marketing Specialist Michelle Greer wrote them.

Have you seen a significant increase in new customers during the contest?

Our website got 47% more new visitors.

What are your future plans for the @NameCheap twitter account?

Possibly more contests. Definitely updates on our service and basic support.

I see NameCheap is on Facebook as well, how has your experience been with that network?

Good. It puts names and faces behind our customers.

How do you think social networking will affect domaining in 2009?

It allows us to offer more hands-on support with our customers and will help us understand how we can offer what our customers want. It will also help connect domainers with other domainers as well as potential buyers for their domains.

Thanks for answering these questions NameCheap! Be sure to follow @DotSauce and check out this List of Top Domainers on Twitter too!

Domain Auction Script - Custom Domain Name and Website Auction Script - DotSauce Readers Use Coupon Code: RSS17 for 17% OFF!*

This article is from DotSauce Magazine - The Domain Industry's HOTTEST Publication!

Interview With @NameCheap: The Most Popular Registrar on Twitter

Domaining with the urban dictionary

Posted by Barry in DnExpose on 30-12-2008

Slang is used quite extensively by all of us every day. Similarly slang is used in Google searches and type-in traffic but is highly variable depending on the popularity of the term. One interesting place to look for slang words is the Urban Dictionary which was named one of Time Magazine’s top 50 websites of [...]

FastCompany And TechCrunch On New TLDs and Cybersquatting

Posted by Adam Strong in DnExpose on 30-12-2008

Chris Dannen of FastCompany blogged his thoughts on the pending release of new TLDs . Dannen feels that the release of the new domain extension will spur a rebirth of cybersquatting.  Too bad Dannen, like many others, has bought in to the idea that cybersquatting equals buying and selling domain names or merely owning more than one domain.  He cites an example of an Iraq War veteran and friend of his who bought up and sold domain names to supplement his income. I’m not sure what this friend of his owns but the act of buying domain names and selling them is not really cybersquatting.  Cybersquatting is illegal. Speculating on domains is not. Owning thousands of domains is not. Selling domains is not.

Dannen also buys in to the message that seems to be one propelling the introduction of new TLDs forward “the Web is running out of memorable domain names.”  Highly unlikely given the number of TLDs we currently have, language variations and made up words and names that are created every day.  Even the name ipod, a name he uses in his piece, meant nothing a mere 7 years prior.

Cyber squatters will suddenly have billions of new domain names to purchase for only a few dollars — no longer will they have to rely on buying domains more expensively secondhand. Trademark infringement suits will balloon from tens or hundreds of domains to thousands and tens of thousands.

Jason Kincaid of TechCrunch follows up to the FastCompany piece, essentially stating that nobody really cares about all these new extensions.  Sure there will be squatters and speculators grabbing up a bunch of domains and it may keep the lawyers busy. We can however look at the history of the latest and greatest new TLD and see that this game is pretty much played out.  A new TLD needs an audience and type-ins and a reason for people to gravitate to it.

As Kincaid points out, people generally don’t navigate to these new TLDs through typeins contrary to what Dannen seems to be saying. The new TLDs are not recession proof in our opinion either.  How well are those .mobi aftermarket sales going right about now?  The Fortune article by Paul Sloan talking about domains as recession proof is clearly dated, given the downward trend that all in the domain space have been feeling.

(c) 2008 DomainNameNews.com

Buy Category Killer Domain Names for the best price possible.

Bodybuilder Found Guilty of “Cyber-Piracy” and Trademark Dilution in American Indian Tribe Domain Name Case

Posted by Adam Strong in DnExpose on 30-12-2008

According to the Miami Herald, bodybuilder Steven Thiele, has been found liable of cyber-piracy and trademark dilution.  He was ordered to pay $3000 plus legal fees.  Thiele had previously demanded the Indian tribe pay $500,000 each for the domain names miccosukeetribeofindiansofflorida.com, miccosukeetribeofindians.com and billycypress.com. The tribe recently had won a default judgment when Thiele did not respond.

Thiele may wish to count his blessings in this case, considering Verizon was just recently awarded $50,000 each for the OnlineNic domain name squatting violations that were also default judgments.

(c) 2008 DomainNameNews.com

DomainFest Global: January 28th to 30th in Hollywood California. Register by December 31st and save $100.

LiveDeal.com Sells YP.com for $3.85 million

Posted by Adam Strong in DnExpose on 30-12-2008

It was previously reported that LiveDeal.com sold YP.com to Yellowpages.com.  SEC filings by LiveDeal.com reveal that the recent sale of the YP.com website brought a sale price of $3.85 million.

Our divestiture of our Internet property “www.yp.com” could adversely impact our revenues.

On November 5, 2008, we entered into an agreement to sell our Internet domain name “www.yp.com” to YellowPages.com for a cash payment of $3,850,000.

While this sale is not specifically for a domain name, Apparently this WAS a domain name only sale, so this definitely does provide for interesting discussion and speculation on the value of the YP.com domain name.

(c) 2009 DomainNameNews.com

NameDrive is introducing 6 new innovative templates.

Domaining.com Charges

Posted by admin in DnExpose on 30-12-2008

When I woke up this morning I check my e-mail and found another email from the all popular Domaining.com. It said Your “Domaining.com account has been closed” I opened it and come to find out. Domaining.com will be charging $35/year to get the newsletter. Which kinda sucks cause I am not paying that.

The newletter s helpful but I will just search each blog they had listed and get the RSS or a newletter from them. I already have other Newsletters coming my way. So I still get the same information for free.

They are just trying to make a check and I think its wrong, where has all the morals gone when domaining. Flipping a domain is fine, but chargeing to get  newsletter and have an account at Domaining.com the only thing I used at domaining.com was the newsletter.

With that said Good Luck to anyone that pays the 35 bucks.

Domaining.com Charges now

Posted by admin in DnExpose on 30-12-2008

When I woke up this morning I check my e-mail and found another email from the all popular Domaining.com. It said Your “Domaining.com account has been closed” I opened it and come to find out. Domaining.com will be charging $35/year to get the newsletter. Which kinda sucks cause I am not paying that.

The newletter s helpful but I will just search each blog they had listed and get the RSS or a newletter from them. I already have other Newsletters coming my way. So I still get the same information for free.

They are just trying to make a check and I think its wrong, where has all the morals gone when domaining. Flipping a domain is fine, but chargeing to get newsletter and have an account at Domaining.com the only thing I used at domaining.com was the newsletter.

With that said Good Luck to anyone that pays the 35 bucks.

FMOZ.net Web Directory

Posted by admin in DnExpose on 30-12-2008

FMOZ.net Web Directory FMOZ.net is one of the most heavily advertised directories on the Internet.

Submit your sites and jump aboard FMOZ.net today!

Our Directory Staff are waiting to approve your links & articles.

Pricing to suit all budgets.

Featured links $29.99 1 Year
Regular links $1.49 1 Year
Regular links with reciprocal $0.50 1 Year

Become an author and submit your articles at FMOZ.net Web Directory

Dnlogik

Posted by admin in DnExpose on 30-12-2008

This was pointed to another site of mine but after recent sales I have opened this blog back up. It will take me a few days to get some post going but They will be here. I also have allot in store for this place. So Stay tuned and check us out.

I do ask how ever if you would link to DnLogik that would be great.

Thanks

Deathstarr

JudicialWatch.org Claims Obama Illegally Granted Change.gov Domain Name

Posted by Adam Strong in DnExpose on 30-12-2008

obamaGovernment watchdog JudicialWatch posted an article today declaring the domain name Change.gov, the location of U.S. President-elect Barack Obama’s newest website may have been illegally granted.  According to the site, Obama’s team initially requested and was denied use of the domain name Change.gov, but the domain was later granted after pressure from his staff. 

Judicial Watch points out:

The agency specifically forbids political or campaign information on any “.gov” website as well as any tax-exempt, nonprofit organization that can engage in lobbying or political campaigning. Obama’s change site proudly features the Obama-Biden Transition Project, a 501c(4) organization that actively engages in lobbying and political campaigning. The website also uses Obama’s favorite invented term of Office of the President-Elect, which is definitely not an official government office.

It seemed to us that Judicial Watch was making a mountain of a mole hill here, so we looked a little harder at what was presented.

The US General Services Administration (GSA) is the government body which manages and allocates the use of the .gov domain name.  It makes sense that campaigning should be forbidden on government allocated domains, but DNN searched the GSA site to find where it forbids this and was unable to find the specific rule.  In fact the rules we did found, leave the allocation open for interpretation and flexible.

According to the GSA website the following entities are permitted use of a .gov domain name :

  • At the federal level, U.S. governmental departments, agencies, programs, and commissions
  • Cross-agency collaborative organizations
  • Federally recognized Indian Tribes (for the -NSN.GOV domain)
  • State government entities and programs
  • Cities and townships represented by an elected body of officials
  • Counties and parishes represented by an elected body of officials
  • Some special exceptions and requests are permitted

It is likely that the Obama team was granted the waiver and use of this domain under the “special exceptions and requests” .  Page 6 of the documents on Judicial Watch (PDF) also point out that the Office of the President-elect is federally recognized and that the GSA is authorized to provide services for this “unique entity that is entitled to government support while retaining characteristics of a private organization.”

Granting the domain seems pretty cut and dry to us, but not illegal.  The use of the domain name moving forward may be one which raises some questions with government watch dog groups.  However, it was not clear to us where on the Change.gov website any campaigning or lobbying was being done.  If the domain is used inappropriately, clearly this should be fixed, but JudicialWatch really provided no concrete proof of any such claims.

The only interesting tidbit I found in all of this was the fact that the request to use Change.gov was made on October 20th, weeks before the election had been decided.  It appears that the campaign wanted to use the domain, and this may have been the reason for the original refusal. It appears that once he was elected, the domain name request was approved.

[Thanks to reader Tyger Gilbert of USAWebAdv.com for the tip.]

UPDATE :  A user on Digg points out that the letter requesting the domain  shows no sign of “demands” or “pressuring”, but merely states that they are requesting a waiver for the use.  He also points out that Judicial Watch is headed by Conservatives. No real surprise here.

TweetDailyDomains.com

Posted by admin in DnExpose on 30-12-2008

TweetDailyDomains.com will tweet you (send out messages via Twitter.com/DAILYDOMAINS) quality domain names at reseller prices…so follow us closely and you just might grab some tweet deals :

Go now to TweetDailyDomains.com

Netfleet partners with Netregistry

Posted by admin in DnExpose on 29-12-2008

Larry BlochNetregistry, Australia’s leading domain name provider, has partnered with Netfleet in a joint venture to expand and improve on Netfleet domain trading site.

Larry Bloch, CEO of Netregistry says “We see significant growth in this area,  Currently our efforts are focused on education as much as anything - most people do not even realise that domain names are now tradeable assets so it’s a question of creating the industry as well as satisfying the demand.”

This is the first real push by a major IT company into the sector of domain trading.

Go now to: Netfleet partners with Netregistry - Netfleet News and Articles

Manly domaining

Posted by Barry in DnExpose on 28-12-2008

Bro-mance - 1 definition - the inseparable relationship between two or more heterosexual, often action-sports-participating, males. Bromance is also going to be a new series on MTV so I was interested to read a book review in the NY Times that commented on all this manliness. Lots of manly terms were defined and perhaps there [...]